this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
973 points (100.0% liked)

196

16216 readers
2215 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Well that depends on if gayness is a continuous or discrete quantity. If gay comes in very small but distinct indivisible units, the minimum could certainly be just 1 of these units.

Still, the upper range is likely to be unbound.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Avogaybros constant

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I don't think there's such a thing as a discrete gay.. number and the sofar unmentioned bi spectrum implies a distributed or Cartesian system of expression

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Considering bisexuality and demi sexuality I suspect that attraction is what we are measuring, not just gayness. Perhaps even attraction along two dimensions - romantic and sexual. This has interesting implications considering that gender itself exists as a spectrum with multiple dimensions of its own, at very least expression and identity, perhaps sex should be incorporated too which further complicates matters...

Nonetheless, I don't believe that any of this precludes our units of attraction from being discrete... I will concede that it's probably more likely, if there is some kind of fundamental attraction particle, that it has comparable properties to the photon.

I'm considering that each of these attraction particles (furthermore referred to as attractons) exists as excitations in the gender/sexuality field. Thanks to wave particle duality we can have a quanta of attraction with continuous possible amounts of attraction associated with each - just like the photon's variable energy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You're also not accounting for the principle of uncertainty with bi and homo curious and the collapsing of the gay wave function

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

It's the quantum gay that we really have to measure, but I can't pin its velocity for some reason.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

So is the Likert, but I bet you anyone trying hard enough can get gayer.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I appreciate the quantification.