Technology

34976 readers

119 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.

Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.

Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

156

Google's Controversial Plan to Disable Older Chrome Extensions Starts June 3 (me.pcmag.com)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes, and Mozilla browsers are an viable alternative. What's the issue?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

It is viable, just lack diversity in terms of web engine. Web tech today are just too complex to have another web engine. Even Microsoft ditch its EdgeHTML and favor Blink, the engine used by Chromium-based browsers.

[–] jaykay 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

But why do you need another one?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Why not?