this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
60 points (82.6% liked)

Cool Guides

4547 readers
3 users here now

Rules for Posting Guides on Our Community

1. Defining a Guide Guides are comprehensive reference materials, how-tos, or comparison tables. A guide must be well-organized both in content and layout. Information should be easily accessible without unnecessary navigation. Guides can include flowcharts, step-by-step instructions, or visual references that compare different elements side by side.

2. Infographic Guidelines Infographics are permitted if they are educational and informative. They should aim to convey complex information visually and clearly. However, infographics that primarily serve as visual essays without structured guidance will be subject to removal.

3. Grey Area Moderators may use discretion when deciding to remove posts. If in doubt, message us or use downvotes for content you find inappropriate.

4. Source Attribution If you know the original source of a guide, share it in the comments to credit the creators.

5. Diverse Content To keep our community engaging, avoid saturating the feed with similar topics. Excessive posts on a single topic may be moderated to maintain diversity.

6. Verify in Comments Always check the comments for additional insights or corrections. Moderators rely on community expertise for accuracy.

Community Guidelines

By following these rules, we can maintain a diverse and informative community. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out to the moderators. Thank you for contributing responsibly!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I don't know what being harder to invade has to do with anything. The question was largest army. The fact that you're trying to put all these extra criteria on top of that is a problem with you not the question. Also construction work and other logistics are very much part of an army and no one would be foolish enough to ignore their importance. That's been true for thousands of years. Certainly true for the US Army we have the US Corps of Engineers and the Seabees as well as other units. They're just as much soldiers as anyone else and frankly maybe more important.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

But the US doesn't literally use soldiers as construction workers to build random roads and bridges. They use private contractors for most things like that. The groups you mentioned just help out a little to practice for wartime. Most construction is done privately.

Size of the "military" on paper is meaningless from a defense perspective, which is the main purpose of a military. What matters is the amount and quality of troops that you can deploy and support in the field, and the speed at which that happens. Someone paving a road in Hunan or building drones for export in Tehran shouldn't be counted as a "soldier" because they are not able to be deployed.

The US doesn't count it's construction workers or factory workers as "soldiers".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I go over a bridge every day that was built by the Army Corps of Engineers. There's numerous cities in this country who rely on levees built by the Army Corps of Engineers. Army Corps of Engineers does way more than you think they do.

If you want to continue to add all these extra criteria that's fine, that was never the criteria of the graphic. It seems silly to spend your time complaining that a graphic with very specific criteria doesn't contain a lot of other random criteria. If that's how you choose to spend your time good for you though.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I'm just explaining to you that all the "largest armies" on there are outliers. Wikipedia lists Iran as having only 600K active personnel:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_Republic_of_Iran_Armed_Forces

The list is just incorrect, and I explained why. South Korea has only 51 million people. Do you really think that 7.5% of all people are in the military? No, that includes "reserves" who actually do not work as soldiers.

In that sense, every male in the US signs up for selective service at 18. Should every male aged 18 to 40 be counted as a member of the military?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Sir facts and logic have no place pointing out cherry picked data on propagandised infographics.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't know what being harder to invade has to do with anything.

Sir what is the primary purpose of a military?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago