this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
53 points (100.0% liked)

Space

8876 readers
3 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

🔭 Science

🚀 Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

helium is small and it’s hard to keep it in a thing because it leaks out at a molecular level

Well yeah. Sounds like a tough problem. Also sounds like a thing you should have accounted for in your design. Also sounds like you should fix all the places where it’s leaking not at a molecular level.

And Boeing, honestly, stop whinging about it being “hard”.

It’s fucking rocket science. Of course it’s hard.

Seriously, as an engineer who’s worked in aerospace, it’s just absolutely shocking to watch Boeing consistently fuck up on stuff like this so regularly. They’ve fallen so, so far, and it’s honestly a bit heartbreaking. They used to be a company that was synonymous with engineering rigor and quality. Now they’re bitching about how it’s hard to build space capsules (uh… yes, obviously…?) as an excuse for their insufficient QC process and development rigor, and can’t even figure out how to match up their outsourced (side note: stop fucking outsourcing) components to their own assembly processes in a coherent, auditable, and safe fashion retroactively - let alone at the time of assembly.

This is what you get when the fucking beancounters run the show.