143
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

How did you come to the interpretation that protection of anonymity were violating copyright?

How do you mean anonymity could give better control over copyrightable information?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

People's right to be forgotten effectively amounts to a right to make the internet remove content of your copyrightable data.

And I was asking how that violated copyright, because the article above is about how the EU courts decided copyright is more important that privacy rights so there's no right to internet anonymity.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Facts are not under copyright, only creative expression are. So, for example your randomly assigned phone number does not have copyright protection.

this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2024
143 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37382 readers
215 users here now

Rumors, happenings, and innovations in the technology sphere. If it's technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS