this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
233 points (96.8% liked)
Programmer Humor
19623 readers
3 users here now
Welcome to Programmer Humor!
This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!
For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.
Rules
- Keep content in english
- No advertisements
- Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Doesn't that construction only work in categories that also contain their own morphisms as objects since a profunctor maps
(Cᵒᵖ × C) → Set
and not the same like(Cᵒᵖ × C) → C
? Since the category of Haskell types special, containing its own morphisms, so the profunctor could be like(haskᵒᵖ × hask) -> hask
? or I just don't understand it.Hom functors exist for locally small categories, which is just to say that the hom classes are sets. The distinction can be ignored often because local smallness is a trivial consequence of how the category is defined, but it's not generally true