this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2024
245 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

30859 readers
452 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Follow-up to last week's story:

https://lemmy.ml/post/16672524

EDIT1: Politicians expect to be be exempt.

EDIT2: Good news: Vote has been postponed due to disagreements.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The images that are flagged by such scanning, local or server side, will have to be manually verified to avoid false persecution. Someone will have to look at the private images you've sent that might get flagged.

These systems have huge margins of error and are incredibly inaccurate, so there will be a significant task in manually verifying everything. And do you trust some government random employee (or just the departments general IT practices or ability to not be hacked) with not leaking your nudes or personal images? I sure as hell don't.

And even if this is handled perfectly and all government employees are super super honorable standup citizens that never do anything slightly wrong ever...There are still malicious governments that persecute minorities, I doubt they will handle these backdoors in digital privacy very well.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

So if I send a photo of our kids playing naked in a baby pool to my wife through signal, some slimy-ass eurocrat in some IT center will be able to 'manually verify' the photo of my naked kids?? Are you mentally sound??

I hate pedos just as much as every other sane parent, perhaps even more so (I'd love to wear "Why, Garry, why?!" t-shirt all day every day). But to hell with this stupid idea that some slimy scumbags will be able to browse my own photos of my own kids. Hell, even any random photo I take, it's my business and nobody elses! Go catch pedos the proper way instead, work a little, we don't need Gestapo or Stasi to hover over everything we do or photograph.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They say they the images are merely matched to pre-determined images found on the web. You're talking about a different scenario where AI detects inappropriate contents in an image.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It will detect known images and potential new images...how do you think it will the potential new and unknown images?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Source? Does the law require that? That's not my impression.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Literally the article linked in the OP...

Article 10a, which contains the upload moderation plan, states that these technologies would be expected “to detect, prior to transmission, the dissemination of known child sexual abuse material or of new child sexual abuse material.”

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

My bad. But that phrasing is super stupid, honestly. What company would want to promise to detect new child sex abuse material? Impossible to avoid false negatives.