58
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Tl;dr an undergraduate paper last year claiming females hunt just as often as males got picked up by the media and amplified before it was discovered their analysis was deeply flawed and unreliable. Here several anthropologists present a very gracious rebuttal.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Some people got very angry with me about this.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago
[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Biology preceding sociology in the first instance. Male muscle mass and female lipid oxidation, maybe. Gendered labour across different cultures. Exceptions not disproving historical trends. Etc.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

That seems somewhat unrelated to this paper about foraging societies.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

You're joking, right?

this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2024
58 points (88.2% liked)

science

13688 readers
733 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS