Programmer Humor

18971 readers

848 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

Keep content in english
No advertisements
Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

314

It's easier to remember the IPs of good DNSes, too. (lemmy.sdf.org)

submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

187 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Today in our newest take on "older technology is better": why NAT rules!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Ok, now I'm fully proposing a new standard, called IPv16! (Keeping with the tradition to jump over numbers.)

Also, it will be fully backwards compatible for a change! That solves the largest complaint from the holdouts!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

IPv6 is already backwards compatible though. There's a /96 of the IPv6 space (i.e. 32 bit addresses) specifically for tunneling IPv4 traffic, and existing applications and IPv4 servers Just Work™ on IPv6 only networks, assuming the host operating system and routing infrastructure know about the 6to4 protocol and are willing to play ball.

I learned a lot about it from this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-oLBOL0rDE

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh nice. Does your system FINALLY provide enough addreses for every Planck volume in the observable universe? It’s been frickin amateur hour, this internet thing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

No, sorry. It's backwards compatible on address length too.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

TBH 4 billion IP addresses is way too many. We should reduce that to 33 million for convenience.