Technology

59587 readers

2617 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

398

Adobe Says It Won’t Train AI Using Artists’ Work. Creatives Aren’t Convinced (www.wired.com)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

48 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 81 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

I know some artists don't mind it, but I just can't hear the word "creatives" as anything other than silicon valley speak for the source of the content they sell. It feels dehumanizing.

Particularly in this case, it's Adobe, so you can just call them artists, designers, photographers, etc.

Or, ya know, just users.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 5 months ago (1 children)

In fairness, it’s Wired who called them creatives, while Adobe called them artists.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's pretty bad. It's like calling people "the talent".

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Or calling all kinds of art "content".

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

Remember when consumers where customers?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

So if artists are “creatives”, what does that make them? “Exploiters”?