UK Nature and Environment

350 readers

61 users here now

General Instance Rules:

No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
Do not spam or abuse network features.

Community Specific Rules:

Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net).
Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.

Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.

Our summer banner is a shot of Coombe Hill, Buckinghamshire by YungOnions.

founded 10 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Natural Resources Wales / Landmark Environmental Case: Man to pay for proceeds of felling crimes in UK first (naturalresources.wales)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In what is believed to be a first in UK legal history, a landowner will have money confiscated under the Proceeds of Crime Act for offences under forestry legislation.

Jeff Lane illegally felled more than 8 hectares of native woodland within the Gower Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty near Swansea between April 2019 and September 2020, without the appropriate licence.

Having previously been found guilty of forestry offences at Swansea Magistrates court in April 2022, Mr Lane was handed a confiscation order by the Judge for £11,280 under the Proceeds of Crime Act (POCA). He was also fined £1,500 for his offences.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This isn't a victory

The Judge agreed with NRW’s assessment that Mr Lane had benefited financially to the tune of £78,640.68 from his crimes. However, the Judge made a confiscation order which orders Mr Lane to pay £11,280 as his available amount.

Shameful

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I mean it's certainly at least a minor one. I agree that it should have been more, but as this is the first of it's kind I'll take something over nothing. Opens the doors for greater punitive legal action in the future.