this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
461 points (96.8% liked)

Europe

8484 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out [email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

crashing problems aside

Ok but that caveat is doing a lot of work there

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Oh don't worry, planes crash no more than once in their lifetime...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In a comment about efficiency? No, it doesn't.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

it's relevant. the worldwide 737-MAX fleet had very low carbon footprint for like a year or a bit more!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

All the 3 digit models with a “7” are Boeing. It’s worth noting that #Boeing is an #ALEC member that supports the republican party in the US & lobbies to eliminate & neuter the #EPA as well as fight every environmental protection possible. So regardless of GHG footprint¹, #boycottBoeing.

  1. I say GHG instead of CO₂ because airlines also have non-CO₂ GHG emissions. There was a scandal recently where #Google stopped showing the GHG emissions on their ticketing platform & swapped in CO₂ emissions to downplay the damage.
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right, so the 737-MAX are very fuel efficient. No argument there. But saying “the parenthetical about ignoring the crashing problems is doing a lot of work in this comment about fuel efficiency” is just nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, the entire fleet was very efficient while it was grounded