this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
1645 points (96.0% liked)

linuxmemes

20454 readers
135 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The alternatives to the GNU tools are largely permissively licensed, yeah? What could possibly go wrong with that..

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

...People who wanted to donate their software to the public with no strings attached could see an uptick in the number of users?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

People making those comments don't realize that much of the desktop Linux stack is MIT/BSD licensed anyway. It's also not like those "permissive licenses bad" people would delete all such licensed software from their system because the result would be unusable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The number of users being those who would rather leverage the software for free, and then resell a walled garden version with proprietary extensions.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

If the proprietary extensions don't add significant value, nobody would buy it in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That's the beautiful thing about gifting software with permissive licenses (when one wants to): it's a gift and anyone can do whatever they want with it for free.

ETA: I DO think that it is important for one who chooses to license software permissively to be informed about their decision and its implications. But, just like consent in other areas, as long as one enters into it intentionally and with the understanding of what the license means, it's noone's place to judge (and, like consent in other interpersonal areas, the license can be revoked/modified at any time - with a new version). Honestly, really weird of those that take issue with individuals choosing to gift their software to humanity - there's way more interesting and useful things to engage in in the FLOSS landscape.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

LLVM and Clang make massive strides over GCC thanks to its license. If it weren't for many of the infamous "GNU'isms", GCC would have dies years ago.