this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
662 points (69.4% liked)

Memes

45887 readers
1516 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

A bunch of idiots is not a war with tanks, artillery, and planes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That bunch of idiots are the ones who control the tanks, artillery, planes, and funding for infrastructure that is required to keep nuclear plants from melting down

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Oh the military did Jan 6? Must have missed that. You know the tanks rolling toward Congress.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The sitting president did it…the commander in chief. I get you like nuclear but this is embarrassing

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The sitting president told... wait for it... A bunch of idiots. I get that you don't like nuclear, but this is embarrassing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don’t dislike nuclear, I dislike bad arguments and bad decision making. The president wields enormous power over the stability and infrastructure required for nuclear to be safe and sustainable. You cannot have watched the debate last night, or the events of Jan 6, and feel confidence that anyone involved can be trusted with a goldfish, much less consistently providing a stable nation capable of securing nuclear plants.

If your argument is “don’t worry a sitting president may have staged an insurrection, but it was incompetent so it’s totally ok to leave him in charge of nuclear plants” then yeah, I think that’s a bad argument. And embarrassing

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Bad arguments like portraying a bunch of idiots as an actual military force and a war? And you're still (kinda) at it. Now a strawman. Yup, you're everything you project about bad arguments. Ciao.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Bad arguments like “the president of the United States tried to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power.” Man the gaslighting from you is wild.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Speaking of strawmans (a weird one at that). And gaslighting. And wild. Projection in case you don't get it.

Why am I bothering. Ciao.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

You keep using all the classic rhetorical terms reserved for people who have argued themselves into a corner. You’re not very good at this. cIaO CiAo