this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
-4 points (48.0% liked)

People Twitter

4846 readers
1542 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying.
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

I mean, yeah Biden hasn't been great at campaigning this time. He's been significantly better at the actual job, and we don't only elect the person. We elect their cabinet effectively as well and Biden surrounds himself with much more competent staff than Trump who has several staffers up for felonies, nevermind himself.

Am I worried? Just about you assholes who keep forgetting that the president doesn't do everything themselves.

Loads of felonies being led by a convicted felon who has said he would commit more crimes the second in office... vs one guy in the group being "old" despite only being a few years older than his opponent.

I get it, Biden is old. I don't get how that one fact counters every other one from the other side.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Umm no one here is being swayed by Biden being old to vote for Trump. I'm worried about those gullible people put there who will fall for it, who have been falling for this same thing since Reagan. There are so many out there that are too illiterate to sit through a debate and depend on short clips (foolishly) to get the vibe, and Biden tripped up and handed over a lot of fodder for dishonest people to use to generate disingenuous footage. We have been sold the idea that you need a strong personality (or at least a strong face) to operate on a state level and have been since... idk Roosevelt is the first personality I can think of where that was played up in school.

You don't seem to understand that most of America doesn't run on reasoning for decision-making, but fear, and the right is a master of wielding that very effectively.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I do understand that those strategies have some effect. I disagree that it means reason is moot, and the more shits that come out of the woodwork with doomerism the more effective it is so I have a question for you. Why are you pushing that narrative as well? What are you doing to change it other than point it out?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago

Half the country runs believing in Fox News, and our literacy is below the sixth grade level, well before reasoning is introduced to the curriculum. I consider myself a fairly logical person, and I see the idea of operating on reason-first (I phrase like this for clarity, as emotional-based choice is valid after processing after reasoning is established) virtually never followed, even when claimed. I have lost multiple jobs because of this exact problem. I am an advocate of it in all situations.

Outside of my bubble, I have watched universities purge philosophy, and all philosophy courses, from their systems. There's a shift in the definition of True, with the "post-truth" movement. You can see how much reason influences the public with how they prosecute minorities, where bigotry is believed over decades of statistics.

Reasoning is non-existent here. Moot, no, reasoning is not of no practical importance, but it cannot be depended on here at this point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Hey just checking in, how are youbfeeling about the situation now?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

With Kamala now the democratic nominee?

I'm not a big fan of former law enforcement (prosecutor at least) being in charge but everything else she's done seems to at least suggest that she takes her jobs seriously along with the responsibility they entail.

I'm waiting to see who the VP is before I get too gung ho, but so far I'm pretty on board.

I don't know exactly why Biden waited so long to decide not to run again but I am happy he provided a good bit of shielding and wasted a ton of the GOP's money on attack ads that can almost be mirrored for free against their nominee.

I think we're gonna see some really ugly rhetoric from the right over her being the nominee and that doesn't make me jazzed. I worry that it will spark another rise in anti immigrant/minority rhetoric and violence like the BS about COVID did, and I work in and among minority groups so I worry what it will do to their outlooks on their future and how they feel about the country they are a part of.

Any specific aspect you want to ask me about or is that just a generic response request?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Wanted to see where you were at after being so stuck you couldn't see that Biden was a bad choice and that it wasn't too late. And maybe an apology would be nice for name calling.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Well that's a shit way to put it.

Biden was an ok choice and he was still polling strong. Him deciding to abstain from the final run doesn't mean he was a bad choice, not does it make any of your analysis correct.

Also: You're still a doomsaying asshole. Not once did you make a reasonable argument supported by data other than your feelings but you continued to push out "If we keep behind a president who has arguably been extremely effective at doing shit, we're handing the election to the guys who eat horse paste and spent double Bidens addition to the deficit for tax breaks while screaming about fiscal responsibility..... because he's a couple years older than the other guy and seems like he's old instead of spouting gibberish and easily proven lies".