Free Software

1073 readers

24 users here now

What is free software?

Free software is software that respects the 4 software freedoms. The 4 freedoms are

The freedom to run the run the program
The freedom to study the source code
The freedom to modify the source code
The freedom to distribute modified versions of the source code

Please note: Free software does not relate to monetary price. Free software can be sold or gratis (no cost)

Rules:

Please keep on topic
Follow the Lemmy.zip rules
No memes
No "circle jerking" or inflammatory posts
No discussion of illegal content

Please report anything you believe to violate the rules and be sure to include rhetoric on why you think it should be removed.

If you would like to contest mod actions please DM me with your rational as to why you feel that the relivant mod action should be reversed. Remember to use rhetoric and to site any relevant sources. You will only get one chance to argue your point and continued harassment will result in a ban.

Overall this community is pretty laid back and none if the things list above normally are an issue.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

possiblylinux127

180

Ladybird - a brand new browser engine that isn't Google or Mozilla (ladybird.org)

submitted 5 months ago by possiblylinux127 to c/freesoftware

50 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent 1 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I mean... considering that firefox is still kind of a clusterfuck for a surprising number of websites...

I am glad this exists but I see no practical use for it for... anyone. And the cynic in me thinks this will be even more ammunition for "just use chromium, it actually works" akin to the crowd who insist on telling every single person who is considering trying out linux to use arch or gentoo.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 5 months ago (3 children)

... Is it?

I genuinely haven't encountered anything broken using it, short of Youtube. And that's less Firefox and more all the extensions trying to make it usable, I think. There are a couple of bits of functionality missing, but in terms of sites working, it seems perfectly fine.

[–] OpenPassageways 6 points 5 months ago

I've also encountered a few issues with Firefox on mobile, but not enough to stop using it as my daily driver.

I don't really blame Firefox though, I'd guess that their implementation is closer to the spec than Chrome's but that companies are cheaping out on testing in multiple browsers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

The search function of the Walmart site was broken for a year or two on mobile but it seems it's been fixed. A few webpages I needed for school explicitly weren't supported in non-chromium browers.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Sonys website breaks for me

Square enix bitches every fucking time

Some other niche sites I use also break in weird and violent ways sometimes

All tested with all add-ons disabled to see if that fixed them, all failed

Lol, downvote me all you want you fucking weridos, doesn't change the facts

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Huh. I've used Sony's site recently and I just opened it to see if I noticed anything broken but it seems fine. Of course somebody not seeing a bug doesn't mean the bug doesn't exist, it's not that I don't believe you. All I'm saying is I've been primarily on Firefox for a while now and that hasn't been my experience.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This was my thought, as well. It also reminds me a bit of this classic xkcd.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

We saw the best innovation during the most competitive times in the browser market.

[–] possiblylinux127 -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think either this will die soon or more likely it will be noticed my companies that have been screwed by Google. Google has made lots of unpopular choices with Chromium and I wouldn't be surprised if at least a few companies started funding it in hopes that it might be viable in 5 years. It took a long time to create Chromium.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If they aren't funding Mozilla, which is a far more significant company with a long history of browser development, the chances they're gonna fund a brand-new browser that very few people have even heard about is next to none.

[–] possiblylinux127 -4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They aren't funding Mozilla as Mozilla is built on egg shells

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

While mozilla/firefox is indeed a giant mess of legacy code: Why would a company instead support a hobbyist project with almost zero resources?

At that point we are in the mythical "What if the small business of the world united and made their own product" territory

[–] possiblylinux127 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

It doesn't have zero resources. It has at least 1.2 million dollars

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent 5 points 5 months ago

It is not exclusively Firefox but Mozilla corp has 750 staff and 593 million in revenue according to Wikipedia.

One million is maybe ten part time developers for a year.