this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
119 points (95.4% liked)

Games

16211 readers
758 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How many games have microtransactions that disappear within a few years? Seems like team fortress 2 is the one place where you can buy an in-game item and still have access to it over a decade later. Not many games can say that.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't get the hate for cosmetic microtransaction, that's the best kind.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (4 children)

The problem with cosmetic microtransactions is that it gives the creators a monetary incentive to make sure nothing you can earn in the game is as appealing as the microtransaction items, or that their availability (in cases where you can earn the same items in-game) are low enough that you'll never reasonably earn what you want.

You can say 'Cosmetics don't matter!' but the astronomical sales of cosmetic items pretty much proves that to the majority of players, that is not the case.

They also often intentionally create game mechanics specifically to ensure that players who aren't paying see the better-looking players who did pay.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can say ‘Cosmetics don’t matter!’ but the astronomical sales of cosmetic items pretty much proves that to the majority of players, that is not the case.

Is it a majority of players or a minority that pays unsustainable sums?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Play a match of Valorant. EVERYONE has skins. There are whales that buy every $100 bundle sure, but even the regular players often end up buying a $20 skin or $50 bundle pretty often.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Play a match of Valorant.

No, thank you. No Chinese spyware on my home PC.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

The problem with cosmetic items is the payout % to the artist. It's so fucking low, I have no idea why artists work so hard for it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

They should make 2 versions. One microtransaction and one slightly cooler obtainable in game.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

Obviously, paying customers would want to look and feel premium. Plenty of events and rewards provide content that look good.

It's the desire to look different that drives the high volume cosmetic sales. If someone can't afford it, they don't lose out on content but still able to access a full-fledged game.

That's a great thing, not possible without microtransactions.