this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
252 points (96.7% liked)

News

22595 readers
4187 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

No, they would not. If they would win from it, they would fight for it instead of fighting to stop it.

We would win because we have free access and use to all human creative works.

There is a reason these companies attack places like the Internet Archive, and it’s not because it the IA helps them make more profit and control others works.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Why do you think extending copyright past the life of the author helps the author? They're literally dead.

The only party that could benefit from something like that would be a corporation that can outlast a mortal's lifespan.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

. . . I don’t?

I think it and all copyright benefits corporations. This is literally the argument I’ve been making this whole time.

I think copyright should be scrapped and human creations should not be walled off.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

they would fight for it instead of fighting to stop it

Your argument is that Disney expanding copyright protections proves that copyright benefits them.

But Disney isn't expanding copyright protections in a way that benefits anybody but themselves. They're abusing their power in the existing system, just as they would in any system.

If it helps, forget about the literal Disney corporation. There will always be some corporation that exists with deeper pockets than any independent creator, because copyright isn't the only reason that corporations exist. It doesn't have to be Disney who steals your work, republishes it, and buries the original. Any corporation with more money than scruples can do it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

And no one can steal your work when it’s not ownable in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

At the same time, everyone can profit from your work and you can't do anything about it. And big businesses, having more capital than you or I, would abuse that to their benefit like they do the current copyright system. But at least the current system gives small copyright owners some semblance of protection and an avenue to contest abuse. Not having copyright would give a creator no avenue to stop someone else abusing their hard work.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You publish a book. Disney publishes that book the next day, because they can afford to have people on payroll whose job it is to literally just scout out new books so that they can publish them themselves.

Me, a book enjoyer, is going to my local bookshop. I ask what's new, and I'm told about Disney's new book. I'm not told about your new book because after all it is the exact same book, and Disney has threatened the store to withdraw all business if they sell anybody's books but theirs.

I buy Disney's book. You get no money. You become poor and destitute.

How does a lack of copyright help you in this instance?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why am I publishing a book? I release my creative works online for free, for anyone and everyone.

Human culture shouldn’t be paywalled off for the benefit of businesses.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Because you invested your time, effort and money to create this piece of art. Why on earth would anybody decide to create art if it was a guarantee that they'd die in a gutter?

In your anarchist utopia, maybe an artist can thrive. But we'd have to get all the way there first.

And in every step from where we are to where you want to get to, the artist is significantly worse off. You're just letting perfect be the enemy of good.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I invest my time, effort, and money into the games and stories I make and release for free online.

Why do I do this? Because creating is fun, and seeing others play or read them is inspiring.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

because you can afford to because you already have a way to support yourself in society

also, not all creatives are idealists, so would need some form of incentive to put in the extra effort to release their work to the public

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I appreciate that, and equally that there are really good artists who can not afford to create and survive on their work, without it. Surely there's a reasonable balance to be had, and megacorporations can be made to respect that balance (in theory), while also paying livable wages. In practice, it would require honest courts, lawyers, and politicians, so there's that.