this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
204 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1573 readers
11 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The car did not get a ticket.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Per mile driven, all of these autonomous systems are statistically better than humans at driving.

It's mostly because humans are dogshit at driving, but you are a lot safer using these systems than not, despite media reporting.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's only because they don't drive that fast, and they just dump most problems to a human driver. If a self-driving car stopped in the middle of an intersection and a human driver hit it, the blame would legally fall on the human despite the fact that the self-driving car caused the issue.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Liability of an accident doesn't factor into those statistics. They include all accidents regardless of blame.

And you act like that exact scenario hasn't happened with human drivers. In Arizona alone, 3.5 people die every day in traffic incidents. Given the number of dumb fuck road ragers brake checking other drivers on the road, stopping in the middle of an intersection and getting hit probably happens at least once a day, probably more.

Yet even with all those fatalities, and other accidents in general, the autonomous systems still have fewer incidents per mile driven.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

These cars were banned from CA roads because they had too many safety issues. That's why they're in AZ. One company didn't address the issue so the CA DMV threatened to pull their registration completely.

https://www.npr.org/2023/10/24/1208287502/california-orders-cruise-driverless-cars-off-the-roads-because-of-safety-concern

Why else do you think Google is testing this thousands of miles from their headquarters?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

That's an apples to oranges comparison. Self driving cars aren't driving on the same roads and in the same conditions. Maybe they're better, but that hasn't really been tested/evaluated.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago

Sir, your whole family died in a waymo accident.

First of all, statistically, the chance was bigger that they didn't die. And now leave the billionaires alone.