this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
837 points (92.9% liked)

linuxmemes

20464 readers
563 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Linux almost never needs to reboot after an update

Doesn't it often need a reboot to apply some updates?

I rember reading something along those lines then I was researching why Fedora installs some updates after a reboot. Most

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Fedora is the immutable I was referring to that does need to reboot. Linux Mint and OpenSuse only need to reboot after an upgrade. I've never had to reboot them after updates. Mileage may vary, of course, as different people have different software, tools, and libraries installed.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I was talking about regular fedora. It's not that you have to reboot, but you don't get to use those updates until you do. The most obvious example is updating the kernel and its modules.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

You're correct. A kernel update would fall under the umbrella of a system upgrade, where the system needs to shut down to allow underlying components to be reloaded.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

to be fair, fedora downloads and apply the update before reboot, windows download, apply and then reboot, that's why it take so much time

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Right, but Fedora failures allows me still to boot. Windows failures forces an uninstallation of the update, killing even more time. There are good and bad things to each approach.