this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
14 points (93.8% liked)

NBA

5090 readers
26 users here now

East - Atlantic
Boston Celtics
Brooklyn Nets
New York Knicks
Philadelphia Sixers
Toronto Raptors
East - Central
Chicago Bulls
Cleveland Cavaliers
Detroit Pistons
Indiana Pacers
Milwaukee Bucks
East - Southeast
Atlanta Hawks
Charlotte Hornets
Miami Heat
Orlando Magic
Washington Wizards
West - Northwest
Denver Nuggets
Minnesota Timberwolves
Oklahoma City Thunder
Portland Trailblazers
Utah Jazz
West - Pacific
Golden State Warriors
Los Angeles Clippers
Los Angeles Lakers
Phoenix Suns
Sacramento Kings
West - Southwest
Dallas Mavericks
Houston Rockets
Memphis Grizzlies
New Orleans Pelicans
San Antonio Spurs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

New Philadelphia 76ers star Paul Georgesaid a “disrespectful” initial contract offer and the lack of a no-trade clause were among the reasons he left his hometown LA Clippers after five seasons.

George, who signed a four-year, $212 million contract to join the 76ers last week, said the Clippers initially offered him two years and $60 million last fall during in-season negotiations that he eventually tabled in February.

“I’m like, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa,” George said on his podcast, “Podcast P.” “Two years, 60? That’s crazy! I’m not signing that.”

When negotiations resumed after the season, George wanted a no-trade clause to go with a three-year, $150 million offer from the Clippers. But he said LA didn’t want to include a no-trade clause or a fourth season on the deal, leading to his decision to team up with NBA MVP center Joel Embiid and 2024 Most Improved Player recipient Tyrese Maxey in Philadelphia.

Quoted most of it here but if anyone wants a 30-day Athletic pass to read the rest just pm me.

I know he was looking for a 4 year deal but the fact that he would’ve taken 3 if it included a no trade clause is new and a bit of a head scratcher that the Clippers were willing to let him walk over that. Presumably they offered him the 3 to match with Kawhi and the plan would be to have them play out the contacts to get people in the new stadium even if they’re not contenders. But it was pretty clear that this team wasn’t going far so maybe the tax bill was too high even for the Clippers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It makes me wonder if LAC wanted to move on from PG13, but didn't want to openly say it. By putting him into positions where he won't accept the contract, they can move on while still saying they tried.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

That seems like it would just cause more problems than it's worth. Why go through all that effort and piss off one of the league's top players in the process?

To me it seems pretty straightforward, they would have gladly had PG back, but only for the price they offered (the same they offered Kawhi according to PG).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Plus, guys at this level / age / injury history rarely seem able to acknowledge that they're not worth what they once were, and that it could be a really bad idea for a team to overpay them. No doubt part of that involves their agents spurring them on.

The reason the Sixers did it is mainly because they're getting desperate to make a good run with Embiid.

@Phegan@[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

right and as we know from PG himself now, the dealbreaker was a no trade clause. LAC offered him the same contract as Kawhi, but PG wanted a NTC and that was a hard no for LAC.