this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
546 points (99.5% liked)

Utah

220 readers
1 users here now

Intro

A community to discuss news, events, politics, tourism, and everything else Utah.

Other Links

Stuff to do

More coming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No, there is no evidence of this except the right wing doesnt want to be associated with their own. Just like jan6 insurrection was supposedly antifa.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

lol.. who the hell thought anti-fa were behind Jan6?

If I recall correctly the insinuation made about this far-right group was on Joe Rogan podcast. This is the only thing I can find that goes into some details regarding the conspiracy theory about the group.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

lol… who the hell thought anti-fa were behind Jan6?

Try Republican Rep. Matt Gaetz @ 1:16:00

If I recall correctly the insinuation made about this far-right group was on Joe Rogan podcast. This is the only thing I can find that goes into some details regarding the conspiracy theory about the group.

Theres this concept of asymmetry of proof which makes it more difficult to disprove something (especially a broad claim) than it is to prove it. I suspect that's why you've been getting downvoted because it takes little effort to say "aren't they actually fbi?" then to go through and find evidence indicating otherwise. This is why the burden generally is to prove something, not disprove something. In this case Joe Rogan/whomever makes up shit and it is his/their responsibility to prove it. Just because someone says something doesn't make it true. For instance if I said unicorns are actually real and are invisible aliens from Jupiter's invisible moon then that is something very easy for me to claim, and would be impossible for someone to definitively disprove. Whereas you could instead ask me to definitively prove it and I should have some reasonable argument for why this exists (with hard evidence to support it) . Fortunately in this case there does seem to be other sources that also dig into these false claims of the Patriot Front. And again, the burden of proof still lies with whomever actually proving these claims rather than other sources disproving them.