this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
14 points (93.8% liked)
NBA
5090 readers
25 users here now
East - Atlantic |
---|
Boston Celtics |
Brooklyn Nets |
New York Knicks |
Philadelphia Sixers |
Toronto Raptors |
East - Central |
---|
Chicago Bulls |
Cleveland Cavaliers |
Detroit Pistons |
Indiana Pacers |
Milwaukee Bucks |
East - Southeast |
---|
Atlanta Hawks |
Charlotte Hornets |
Miami Heat |
Orlando Magic |
Washington Wizards |
West - Northwest |
---|
Denver Nuggets |
Minnesota Timberwolves |
Oklahoma City Thunder |
Portland Trailblazers |
Utah Jazz |
West - Pacific |
---|
Golden State Warriors |
Los Angeles Clippers |
Los Angeles Lakers |
Phoenix Suns |
Sacramento Kings |
West - Southwest |
---|
Dallas Mavericks |
Houston Rockets |
Memphis Grizzlies |
New Orleans Pelicans |
San Antonio Spurs |
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It makes me wonder if LAC wanted to move on from PG13, but didn't want to openly say it. By putting him into positions where he won't accept the contract, they can move on while still saying they tried.
That seems like it would just cause more problems than it's worth. Why go through all that effort and piss off one of the league's top players in the process?
To me it seems pretty straightforward, they would have gladly had PG back, but only for the price they offered (the same they offered Kawhi according to PG).
Plus, guys at this level / age / injury history rarely seem able to acknowledge that they're not worth what they once were, and that it could be a really bad idea for a team to overpay them. No doubt part of that involves their agents spurring them on.
The reason the Sixers did it is mainly because they're getting desperate to make a good run with Embiid.
@Phegan@[email protected]
right and as we know from PG himself now, the dealbreaker was a no trade clause. LAC offered him the same contract as Kawhi, but PG wanted a NTC and that was a hard no for LAC.