this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2024
1124 points (99.0% liked)

World News

38255 readers
2185 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Multiple parties are jockeying for position in the aftermath of France's seismic snap election. The leftist New Popular Front (NPF) insists its ideas should be implemented.

France's left wing New Popular Front (NPF) - now the largest group in parliament - has called for a prime minister who will implement its ideas including a new wealth tax and petrol price controls.

The leftist alliance secured the most seats in the recent French elections but fell short of the 289 needed for a majority in the National Assembly, France's lower house of parliament.

President Emmanuel Macron's Together bloc came in second and Marine Le Pen's far-right National Rally (RN) party finished third.

France's parties are now jockeying for position and it's unclear exactly how things will shake out, but the NPF has insisted it will implement its radical set of ideas.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 85 points 1 month ago (23 children)

I will enjoy hearing about how the rich will just move away from their fancy mansions on the Riviera and their suites in Paris to avoid paying this tax and then seeing it not happen.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

Why would they move? This is an income tax, not a wealth tax and the wealthy typically have relatively little "income". Sure they may have a net worth of tens, hundreds, or even thousands of millions but their "incomes" (as defined by tax codes) can be surprisingly low.

Look at the CEOs like Steve Jobs and Jeff Bezos whose salary was a single US dollar. They were incredibly wealthy but had nearly no normal income.

So unless you jigger the tax code to capture the work arounds the wealthy use this income tax will hardly touch them. It will only catch high wage earners, like a software dev working FAANG or something.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I guess that's an argument for also having a wealth tax.

Because most of them still won't move. Paris will not become a less desirable city to live in.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Paris will not become a less desirable city to live in.

Was it ever desirable?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The city of light? The city of love? Famed for its art and culture and cuisine? Full of beautiful architecture?

No, no one ever wants to go there.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Have you ever been there or just seen the photos?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I get that you don't like Paris, but there's a reason why a lot of rich people live there and it isn't because it's a terrible place.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)