this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
307 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

57455 readers
4611 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Companies should be forced to pay thousands of dollars to each customer that gets their data stolen on top of paying for any damages caused by the use of the stolen data. That would put them out of business with a breach this large.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You'll take your check for $3.27 from the class action lawsuit that settled 4 years ago, and you'll be happy

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They all get cybersecurity insurance to limit/eliminate that risk and pass it down to someone else. Yeah, we're at a point where companies have accepted it'll happen and pay for fucking cybersecurity insurance to protect their capital instead of spending that money on actual security.

Increasing the liability just means the premiums will be passed down to the users, and insurance companies will be rolling in cash. Not like the users would get the settlements anyway.

And of course there's the whole problem of disposable LLCs, so even a corporate death penalty would do shit, because our society doesn't give a shit about people, only capital.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Needs to be a percentage of revenue earned to eliminate the possibility of passing the buck. So... It's not happening any time soon.

  • Someone who has to pay higher rates because PG&E exec pocketed revenue instead of investing in company infrastructure, killing numerous people across multiple incidents.