this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
11 points (100.0% liked)

Quark's

1106 readers
7 users here now

Come to Quark’s, Quark’s is Fun!

General off-topic chat for the crew of startrek.website. Trek-adjacent discussions, other sci-fi television, navigating the Fediverse, server meta (within reason), selling expired cases of Yamok sauce, it’s all fair game.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't keep ongoing pay subscriptions to streaming services. Not a judgment of those who do; just my personal preference. I've done one month of Disney+ at a deep discount (to see season one of The Mandalorian) and two months of Paramount+, both times in the past. With Lower Decks' upcoming 4th season and SNW's "Those Old Scientists," I've been thinking about subbing to Paramount+ again. However, with the WGA/SAG-AFTRA strike, I've been wondering if not subscribing to Paramount+ would be in support of the strike.

From what I've found, the WGA and SAG-AFTRA are not currently calling for not subscribing to, or cancelling subscriptions to, streaming services.

Actor John Carroll Lynch on Twitter on July 18, 2023, quote of part of his video (he had previously called for cancelling streaming service subs):

https://twitter.com/MrJCLynch/status/1681324518806278144?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

"I still think it's a good idea, but I've been informed by the union that they do not require that and they don't want that. I don't know why — something to do with the negotiations that I don't agree with, but I do follow the union recommendations, because that's what this is all about."

On Tumblr, author Neil Gaiman replied to a question about cancelling streaming service subscriptions to support the strike. July 12, 2023:

"The WGA has not called for anyone to boycott any of the streamers or to stop their streaming services yet. It's not "crossing the picket line" to watch something on a network that we are striking against. ("Crossing a picket line" is a very real, specific thing with a real meaning.)

I've seen it being discussed, but until the WGA calls for it, I don't suggest doing it."

https://www.tumblr.com/neil-gaiman/722696522150641664/hi-mr-gaiman-i-always-thought-if-i-were-to?source=share

Mr. Gaiman's Tumblr response also has a link to a June, 2023 L. A. Times column, "Column: Is it time to boycott Netflix? How streaming consumers could shape the strike" which I'm posting here because sometimes links to online pages are ephemeral.

So, okay Paramount+. You'll soon be getting some quatloos from me.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That would be my viewpoint if streamers hadn't started disappearing shows from their platforms. Disney+ did that to a number of shows, and there's Paramount+'s treatment of Prodigy. The streaming platforms are for-profit businesses, but with the opacity of providing information as to what constitutes enough views for the money, it's messy. So, I'm going to go with the WGA/SAG-AFTRA recommendation, which for now is to not cancel subscriptions.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I don't think our positions are actually different.

If you subscribe to streamers to access scripted content, you should keep doing that.

If, as with Prodigy, it's possible to purchase that content another way, that's also a good thing.

Either way, it's sending the message that the demand is there.