196

16087 readers

2080 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

153

Bezos butt rule (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Ars Technica: Dirty diaper resold on Amazon ruined a family business, report says

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is a fair criticism.

From my read, other details mentioned that the reviewer realized and mentioned that they suspected the item was returned and not inspected before being re-sold. This makes the review about the return process, not about the item itself.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah that's not an unreasonable read of it. IMO that's basically speculation on the part of the buyer though, and the underlying fact is still the quality of the product as they received it. To me "return process" seems more like if they were themselves trying to return the product and gave a review based on their experience doing that return.