this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2024
23 points (96.0% liked)
Public Health
360 readers
2 users here now
For issues concerning:
- Public Health
- Global Health
- Health Systems & Policy
- Environmental Health
- Epidemiology
- etc.
🩺 This community has a broader scope so please feel free to discuss. When it may not be clear, leave a comment talking about why something is important.
Related Communities
- Medical Community Hub
- Medicine
- Medicine Canada
- Premed
- Premed Canada
- Public Health (📍)
See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link ([email protected])
Rules
Given the inherent intersection that these topics have with politics, we encourage thoughtful discussions while also adhering to the mander.xyz instance guidelines.
Try to focus on the scientific aspects and refrain from making overly partisan or inflammatory content
Our aim is to foster a respectful environment where we can delve into the scientific foundations of these topics. Thank you!
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Tldr; newer generations are increasingly at risk of cancer compared to older generations at a pretty surprising rate, up to 169% higher in one category of cancer
I guess that it is caused by higher rates of identification due to newer technologies, higher survival rate leading to reocurrence or genetic susceptibility being passed on, and an increase in certain pollutants or use of substances that increase risk of certain cancers. Theres also a possibility of one type of cancer which is confused for another type when it metastasizes, which was likely more common in 1930 than today with less accurate detection and identification methods
If they didn’t correct for these factors, it would make for a very poor scientific article indeed.