this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
44 points (75.6% liked)

New Communities

16847 readers
17 users here now

A place to post new communities all over Lemmy for discovery and promotion.

Rules

The rules may be more established as time goes on, but it's important to have a foundation to work on.

1. Follow the rules of Lemmy.world - These rules are the same as Mastodon.world's rules, which can be found here.

2. Include a community title and description in your post title. - A following example of this would be New Communities - A place to post new communities all over Lemmy for discovery and promotion.

3. Follow the formatting. - The formatting as included below is important for people getting universal links across Lemmy as easily as possible.

Formatting

Please include this following format in your post:

[link text](/c/[email protected])

This provides a link that should work across instances, but in some cases it won't

You should also include either:

[email protected]

or instance.com/c/community

FAQ:

Q: Why do I get a 404?

A: At least one user in an instance needs to search for a community before it gets fetched. Searching for the community will bring it into the instance and it will fetch a few of the most recent posts without comments. If a user is subscribed to a community, then all of the future posts and interactions are now in-sync.

Q: When I try to create a post, the circle just spins forever. Why is that?

A: This is a current known issue with large communities. Sometimes it does get posted, but just continues spinning, but sometimes it doesn't get posted and continues spinning. If it doesn't actually get posted, the best thing to do is try later. However, only some people seem to be having this problem at the moment.

Image Attribution:

Fahmi, CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0, via Wikimedia Commons

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Attention StarTrek fans! You're new assignment to the Fediverse has arrived. All hands, boarding has begun! Make it so! Join us at the exclusive home for Star Trek on Lemmy.World!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (7 children)

So, not that parallel communities are at all bad, I feel like it's warranted to ask why this community when we've already got the dedicated startrek instance and its communities: https://startrek.website/, such as [email protected] and [email protected]?

At this point in the growth of lemmy, I feel like unneeded duplication without any reason doesn't really help things. Should a community die we can always start new ones where ever we want. But splitting things and making it harder for users to navigate the space probably isn't a good idea unless there's something you want to achieve with this community?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I am am uppity vegetable and I approve this message!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Literally one of my favorite lemmy communities.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It might have something to do with no longer being able to participate: https://startrek.website/modlog?page=1&userId=162731

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Oh, so it's just another "I got banned for being an asshole so I'm making my own community with blackjack and hookers!" situation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The open mod logs are fucking amazing.

This is the funniest shit I've seen today lmao.

You see that OP had started the whole argument too? They brought up Discovery in a Strange New worlds episode discussion. Said the episode was the anti of what the discovery creator wanted and then stated all the bigotry shit when asked to explain.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yup, I actually remembered those comments from when I was on that thread the other day. Didn't pay attention to the username, of course, so I didn't know he was OP until it was pointed out here. These toxic Star Trek "fans" are so annoying. I don't like Discovery, either, but it has nothing to do with the cast and everything to do with the writing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The moment somebody complains that a current star trek is too progressive I just have to laugh.

From the very beginning the show has been progressive in social issues!

To make a whole new sub because you got banned for complaining a ST show was too progressive is just fucking priceless. OP is straight up living the bender meme and doesn't even realize it.

I gotta say again I love the public mod logs. I feel so much catharsis from this after once being a target of /r/watchRedditDie. A user lied and said I banned him for posting a picture of Snoo pissing on the flag. I had actually banned him for posting a picture of hornets coming out of a penis.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

From the very beginning the show has been progressive in social issues!

Absolutely. I have to conclude that these "fans" never actually got the message of the show from the beginning. Is there plenty to criticize Nutrek for? Certainly. But being "woke" isn't one of them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

That's a lot of homophobia there

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Damn I love Lemmy lol.

The open modlog is great.

OP getting banned seems sorta justified if that log is what caused it. Stating that the show(ST Discovery) they have issues with was progressive and then commenting how it made every non-gay white character evil or negative is really just the type of shit I used to see on Twitter when the show was first coming out.

That's not even mentioning that the whole reason the comment chain started was because OP brought up his hate for the creator of Discovery in a discussion for a Strange New World episode. There was no need for the whole conversation to begin besides OP wanting to cause an argument. Mods didn't want to deal with that shit.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh the banned me already. On par with that community. Don't worry, they will ban thousands more in the coming weeks.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

As soon as I realized it was the reddit mods I knew there would be a need for an alternative community. This isn't reddit where they can ban rivals communities.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I say the more the merrier. I'm still going to use startrek.website, but it's good to have a presence on other instances to avoid becoming reddit.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yea like I said, not against parallel communities at all. Just curious what the motivation is here, and also feel that right now, just as the migration wave has stopped, it might be a good time to sort of "take care of the space" where we can.

Though I do hope user defined multi-communities come at some point to help out smaller communities. It's so easy to lose track of them as a user.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When the final season of STD premieres it will become clear.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

In many ways I hope not.

On the whole, I really don't like Discovery. But we all know what the show is and isn't and now it's cancelled with Trek moving on in other forms. There isn't really anything to talk about any more apart from some insightful retrospectives. A community full of people critiquing a show for being what we all know it is in its fifth season doesn't sound like a necessarily healthy thing TBH.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The mods on startrek.website are the same ones from reddit and care little about transparency or actually hosting a star trek community that fosters open discussion. They are frequently banning users that voice opinions that don't break any rules except mod opinion.

This has been going on for some time and is the perfect use case for why decentralizing common discussion topics is a feature, not a bug, of the fediverse/lemmy

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I mean, I read the article you linked to (and wrote?), and it wasn't really substantive, so I'm not sure moderating it was particularly egregious. I liked talking about the history of nu-trek production and what people have been involved at what times ... that's interesting stuff! But most of the opinions in the article were, IMO, crude, shallow and unsubstantiated TBH.

Still, I think it's been made clear ... this community will be about fostering a more openly critical and opinionated space ... that's cool ... go for it. It might be nice to explain that in the sidebar or something if it hasn't already.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My experience with the /r/startrek mods is that while they aren't super transparent, their actions are usually justified.

A lot of people who get banned for "the wrong opinions" aren't banned for their opinion, their are banned fro their aggressive behavior. Some people want a space where they can be loud and angry, and those mods don't want to provide that space. I'm fine with that. I don't like communities where I log in and the top posts are always people loudly making the same complaints day in and day out.

Just a few weeks ago we ran into this on tildes, a site not even dedicated to star trek. We had someone complaining about the /r/startrek mods, then going on to post really angry yet lazy comments about Star Trek that do not fit the Tildes community guidelines. They were asked to straighten up. It's not about the opinions, it's about the behavior.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That is part but not all. We are fostering a true Star Trek community that welcomes all Star Trek fans. It's something the larger Star Trek community has been longing for but it has not been available until now. If you want to explore all of what Star Trek has to offer, our community strives to spotlight it. We are inclusive and not restrictive. As long as you are respectful toward community members your subscription is welcomed.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The com at the time was dominated by discussion of the Prodigy cancellation, so it was a relevant topic and not being overly critical for the sake of being overly critical. It presented an opinion of the cancelation that wasnt predicting doom and gloom for the franchise like the mod line being pushed at the time.

Even if it isn't substantial, why isn't there a list of blocked domains? Or a rule about it? It could have spurred a discussion in the comments, what makes a community forum like this so special. The point is it didn't violate any community standards. Then when I tried to open a discussion about it to try and refine the rules/community standards moving forward (early days of reddit emigration) I was permabanned for starting drama.

I'm not looking for a com where everyone is super critical. I am looking for one where mods are acting as petty little tyrants banning well meaning contributors because they don't have the exact same opinion on certain things as they do.

The mods are more interested in the reddit community and it shows. It's clear Lemmy is downstream of reddit to them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Which our community is lemmy centric and will be nurtured into a thriving community of Star Trek fans.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Yeah, at this point feel like it'd be more helpful for some communities to exist bu restrict posts and redirect people to instances that have an established community so serving as a guide on where to go.

Much like how back on reddit there'd be subs that only served that purpose of redirecting users to the main community despite having millions of active users.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Because people can have their own community, just like on reddit? The only reason on reddit that you saw those redirects was because people got that community name and did it themselves. In a small amount of cases, it might have been for the standard communities that reddit set up in the beginning too, but that should be very few like that.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

We don't want a clone of reddit which was very restricted. We know LW is well funded, the other one is not.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not wanting to copy every aspect of Reddit is fine, and kind of the point of Lemmy even. But pretending like everything that happens in Reddit sucks just because it's on Reddit reeks of sour grapes.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

Paramount controlling what is said on forums doesn't sit well with everyone. What they did on reddit will not occur here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lemmy World also has a lot of downtime. It seems an odd decision to host your community there, but good luck.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

DDOS attacks happen.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Those two sentences seem completely unrelated

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The real problem is that there aren’t any good tools for users to deal with this. As a user, I wish I could just join some kind of meta community that aggregates content from multiple communities, instead of having to manually track down and join all the random star trek instances on the fediverse.

Having a lot of communities for the same topic is ultimately good, but the user experience needs to be good too.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Having a lot of communities for the same topic is ultimately good, but the user experience needs to be good too.

Yea, and we're in a moment right now where making a new parallel community can actually disrupt the user experience, IMO.

Though, to be clear, it would be good if some features came to make it easier to participate and keep up with multiple parallel communities.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which is our goal. We want a rich and vibrant Star Trek community. One that isn't restricted to Paramount approval.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

One that isn’t restricted to Paramount approval.

Wait ... what? You think startrek.website (I'm guessing) is subject to Paramount's whims or astroturfing? Where does that come from?

I'm also guessing part of the idea of this community is to be more openly critical like the "free people, we don't bend the knee" sort of sub-reddit? Which is fine ... just trying to get a feel here and I think being open and clear is good.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When STD releases it will be very obvious. Just watch their modlog as they ban anyone critical of the series. Unlike reddit they can't hide their actions on lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I’m getting the impression that you were banned from their community for something you posted, and decided to start your own community with blackjack and hookers in response.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It's really poorly managed and run by the same people who run the reddit subreddit. They don't have a good track record on moderating and frequently ban anyone posting criticism.

Unlike that site, we accept all Star Trek fans, both old and Nu.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Any more detail on that? I hang out there and haven't had or seen any trouble.

I've been critical and gotten pushback from the admin (I was criticising Discovery, as you might imagine), but so long as I could explain my opinion and do so politely there didn't seem to be an issue at all, and I don't think that's an unreasonable standard.

If a different moderation policy is what you're offering here ... could you elaborate on that?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

This has been going on for some time and trying to be kept quiet by the mods/admins of that instance

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago

It's the same mods that run the reddit subreddit. That says all you need to know.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It seems well managed to me. I get that one may not like their decisions, but I don't think that's the same thing as being poorly managed.

And, like, it's their website. They can choose what content they host there however they like. And I welcome a space where people who don't want to abide by their choices can keep doing their thing.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

I would say it is poorly managed for the fact that their rules and community standards are not clearly outlined. They ban for reasons not listed in their rules. For a community this large, there needs to be some sort of outlined expectations. It's fairly apparent they are more interested in moderating the subreddit and this Lemmy community is downstream of that in their minds. Expecting us to just magically know the subreddit standards without being listed out is textbook bad management.