Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
view the rest of the comments
@originalfrozenbanana
> friend of Epstein
Who banned #Epstein from #MarALago when he tried to hit on the underage daughter of one of its members, yes
> who stored top secret documents in a bathroom as your candidate.
Kinda like how #JoeBiden stored top secret documents in his car and garage?
See like I said you don't care about any of these things, you just don't like #Trump. If you cared about these critiques, you would not have supported #JoeBiden while he was running for president.
Biden cooperated with record requests. Why didn’t Trump? The only reason Biden was investigated was so that your side could use it as a talking point about how they are both the same when they are not.
It is very common for some records to need to be returned during and after a presidency. It is NOT AT ALL common for presidents to refuse those requests. THAT is the difference.
@originalfrozenbanana
> Biden cooperated with record requests. Why didn't Trump?
It's telling that you are choosing to move the goalposts all the way over there.
> The only reason Biden was investigated was so that your side could use it as a talking point about how they are both the same when they are not.
Source?
@originalfrozenbanana
> It is very common for some records to need to be returned during and after a presidency. It is NOT AT ALL common for presidents to refuse those requests. THAT is the difference.
We agree here, although it has nothing to do with my argument. Keeping the documents is the crime, not refusing to give them back.
No, refusing to comply with the records request is what was so unusual. You’re trying to pretend like it was normal. It very much was not. That’s why Trump is facing charges and Biden is not. Trumps investigation was well founded, and Bidens was political fodder for your side to create a false equivalency. But again, you don’t care. This is all just window dressing. The right doesn’t care about due process or justice anymore. This is all just theater while your side calls for bloodshed. You’ve gone mask off, you don’t have to pretend anymore. Be yourself! Admit that you’re thirsty for a dictator or a king.
@originalfrozenbanana
Now you just have me wondering if you really know how to read 🤣 Is the claim that refusing to comply with records requests is normal in the room with us right now?
@originalfrozenbanana
> That’s why Trump is facing charges and Biden is not.
Nope! It was because "It would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict him — by then a former president well into his eighties — of a serious felony that requires a mental state of willfulness"
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/4456879-special-counsel-describes-biden-as-elderly-man-with-a-poor-memory-in-eye-raising-report/
@originalfrozenbanana
> The right doesn’t care about due process or justice anymore.
I am not "the right". I'm not even #MAGA lol
> Admit that you’re thirsty for a dictator or a king.
Because I am voting for #Trump? 🤣