this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
25 points (96.3% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53911 readers
253 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
25
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I'm happy enough to seed til kingdom come, but I'm not aware of any facility that allows this with the 'Arrs.

Is there a way to continue seeding after download is completed, and also after the files have been moved and renamed to conform to whatever convention you have in place that the media players can pick up?

I currently have them continuing for 3x ratio in the downloads folder but that's duplicating files for who knows how long, and I don't have an enormous amount of space.

Can the torrent client be hooked back to the files under their new names, and can it be automated?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

one caveat is the need for *rr apps to have direct access to the storage filesystem, and not connect through some filesharing protocol (smb, NFS, etc..) afaik. ISCSI might be good since it's presented as an actual system drive, speculating.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Works fine over smb and NFS. *arr apps have no way of knowing if a folder is a mounted share or not

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Sure *are apps might not have a way of knowing but they are still limited by SMB's limitations. If you're sharing individual folders you simply can't hardlink across them. But my bad for thinking SMB didn't allow hardlink inside the same share mount point.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have my arrs connected through SMB and hardlinks work fine.

I'd guess it's more about the underlying filesystem, I've got ext4.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you sharing the top folder holding both folders where you're creating the hardlinks or are you creating individual shares for each folder?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The former.

You cannot hardlink across drives, and I'm guessing the OS might not know it's one drive if you've got multiple shares.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

For sure! Yeah I was just remembering that shares get mounted as a drive when you access them. So makes sense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can't you use a docker CIFS volume?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

CIFS is SMB under a diferent name, and it might be that inside a share you can hardlink, but not across shares in the same filesystem.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm aware that CIFS is essentially SMB. Is the issue on the host or the container side?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's neither, it's a limitation of SMB, if you have multiple shares set-up that mount to the root of the SMB share, you can't hardlink accross them, but inside a single share in the root of the SMB share apparently it's not an issue.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Fun fact, just encountered this very issue myself lol. I hate the fact that I had to set up share per dataset, but it works and with smb enumeration they at least don't show up for other users.