this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
72 points (100.0% liked)
Europe
8484 readers
1 users here now
News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe ๐ช๐บ
(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, ๐ฉ๐ช ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures
Rules
(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)
- Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
- No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
- No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.
Also check out [email protected]
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Presenting in terms of marketshare is maybe not the best metric. My understanding is that the EU motivation here isn't so much the chips themselves as is it a stable supply chain for industries that rely on said chips.
It might be better to measure what percentage of existing EU "critical demand", for some definition of "critical demand", can be met domestically.
That is, the EU's goal probably isn't "become the dominant player in the chip market" so much as "don't permit problems abroad to knock out critical EU industry". It probably is not the case that they need to have a large percentage of absolute marketshare to achieve that goal.
I'd also add that the US is subsidizing several fabs for what sounds like similar reasons.