this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
28 points (96.7% liked)

China

1983 readers
3 users here now

Discuss anything related to China.

Community Rules:

0: Taiwan, Xizang (Tibet), Xinjiang, and Hong Kong are all part of China.

1: Don't go off topic.

2: Be Comradely.

3: Don't spread misinformation or bigotry.


讨论中国的地方。

社区规则:

零、台湾、西藏、新疆、和香港都是中国的一部分。

一、不要跑题。

二、友善对待同志。

三、不要传播谣言或偏执思想。

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm going to use this video as a reference for my own website project.

What do you all think?

It seems that Japanese and Chinese website design is just superior to Western design.

The comments are bad as usual haha

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Super scattered thoughts incoming

Guess it depends on your target audience, the best app is the one that your users want to use (or have to use if you're into that kind of thing).

I wish the video had some specific walkthroughs of using multiple large features in a super app, like the super app version of their example of opening 4+ apps to get a friends coffee. Is it faster / more seamless? I don't doubt that it is or could be, I just haven't used any of the super apps.

Feels like a vim vs emacs situation. I love vim, it's fast and has all the text editing tools I need, but emacs ships with an irc client and tetris which is dope.

Modern American app and web design is surprisingly meh. The ideal is nice (responsive to various screen sizes, accessible) , but most sites fail all over the place (I've never worked with anyone who knows accessibility well, myself included). Plus, there is so much dead, empty space on desktop sites. Not sure that hyper cluttered would be good for new users or my ADHD, but I can see the appeal.

Good luck with your project! Mind if I ask what it is?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Something that people yake for granted is that while some UI patterns are more intuitive and sensible than others, the larger picture which is formed when countless such patterns are stiched together usually relies on cultural inertia to be generally accessible. Some softwares are revolutionary in their design but most have to stick within a narrow window of what other popular softwares are doing. GNOME and KDE for example took a lot of cues from Windows and Mac were doing over the years. This is mostly because Microshit and Apple are monopolistic companies with a deep market reach and deviating drastically from the norms set by them would dissuade a lot of potential newcomers.

China's stuff--websites and apps--looks different because they were not tethered to norms set by the Western tech industries since they did not or could not cater to the Chinese market. I don't mean to say it is better or worse because of that. But it's good that this variety exists.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Totally agreed about that. It's called the Principle of Least Surprise for a reason. Users don't want to learn your software, they just want to achieve their goal in an easy way. Inertia and convention guide all that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)