Communism

If the employees all take a week off, an organization grinds to a halt. If the bosses take a week off, it's business as usual. The employees do all the labour, but because of their relation to the equipment (tools, software, machinery, what have you) they are forced to give away almost all of the value they created to the boss. The boss does nothing except own the equipment, and yet reaps almost all the rewards. The bosses of all organizations, collectively, put employees and prospective employees into a dilemma: give them most of the value you create, or starve. In many if not most industries, it is prohibitively expensive to expect somebody to buy the equipment to work for themselves, among other unrealistic expectations.

This fundamental relationship is a defining feature of capitalism. It cannot be done away with through the use of unions, and we can see this by looking at Sweden. Sweden still has homelessness, worker exploitation, value extraction, despite high union membership. The "success story" of capitalism is still exploitative, and again as we see in Sweden with the current dismantling of the social safety net, it is also temporary.

But I'm not here to flesh out all the details, for God's sake read The Communist Manifesto by Marx and Engels or On Authority by Engels, they're not that long. I believe in you.