PC Gaming

8625 readers

1004 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

Be Respectful.
No Spam or Porn.
No Advertising.
No Memes.
No Tech Support.
No questions about buying/building computers.
No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

141

Intel Battlemage GPU has surfaced in the wild — GPU spotted with 24 Xe2 cores, 19 Gbps memory, 12GB VRAM, 192-bit bus (www.tomshardware.com)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Intel pushing into the gpu space is so obviously them trying to get the public to R&D AI hardware since Nvidia is so far ahead of everyone in that game.

It would be great if they accidentally did some good, but it's not something they are going to keep getting better at.

A Linux optimized GPU would be an interesting product, even if its still just R&D for an entirely different goal

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ironically a field where AMD sucks at too. Though, there has been some good progress & fixes with ROCm recently. I don't mind a win / win situation between Intel & consumers though. The gpu market is seriously fucked for quite a while now and some more competition would really help.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm skeptical about how much another competitor would help...if intel can offer a comparable product, they'll get right in on the price gouging too. Why wouldn't they?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Because Intel is in a position where they would need to increase their market share first and foremost. They would not have any sort of benefit from offering overpriced GPUs that no one wants to buy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

So they're either in the "no one wants to buy" situation, with a product that doesn't quite measure up and a lower price is the incentive to buy, or they reach parity with AMD, and bring the price up to match as well.

Maybe there is a window in between where they're sacrificing some profit to grow their market share, and regular customers benefit, but I have 0 faith in this economic system.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

R&D AI hardware

The consumer space has always been to pay for the commercial R&D

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

You arent wrong.

And for what its worth, i also like boobies