this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
770 points (98.9% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6429 readers
611 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Random twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Low Hanging Fruit thread.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. These include Social media screenshots with a title punchline / no punchline, recent (after the start of the Ukraine War) reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Low effort thread instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 95 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Man, China must be watching this shitshow, looking at Outer Manchuria and wondering what exactly Russia could do about it at this point if they decided to reverse the Treaty of Aigun...

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

A nuclear power just had its sovereignty “violated.”

Nukes didn’t fly.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

And this is why nuclear powers don't start stupid wars of conquest, because if they fail (normally they fail), "nukes fly".

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Pretty soon the world is going to need proof that they have even one working warhead before that stops being a viable defense.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

I remind you of the famous launch-site homing russian SAM and dare them to prove it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 weeks ago

That's just the thing: No one knows, not even the Russians.
Which is why they won't launch them. Cause that could lead to a worse outcome for Putin than total annihilation - public embarassment.