this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
390 points (96.7% liked)

Fediverse

28418 readers
833 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The only alternatives mentioned were Threads and Bluesky.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You sound like you get your knowledge of European and British laws from tabloid journalism

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Since when did the NYT become tabloid journalism?

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/10/world/europe/germany-pro-palestinian-protests.html

Or Wikipedia?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_in_the_United_Kingdom

Which says, "there is no general right to free speech in the UK."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

First one is about Germany, not UK. Secondly, you do realise wikipedia is unreliable, prone to edit wars and subject to those that have the most passion for a topic (like free speech "absolutists"/racists). It's why academia tell you its a poor reference and to not bother.

Can you find a UK example that you think overstepped the line?

I'm in the UK, critical of Israel and not been arrested yet...

It's always interesting seeing distrorted American views of the UK.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

John Richard here is definitely an American. He doesn't understand the difference between "free speech" and "freedom from hatred"

Those of us in truly modern countries enjoy the latter and are very happy to have it.

It's a common thing in backward-thinking, religious countries to think that the former is better.