Science Memes

10885 readers

4071 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.
Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

[email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

869

Peer review (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

56 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

So it's like a crowd strike code review

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Scientists can get really petty in peer review. They won't be able to catch if the data was manipulated or faked, but they'll be able to catch everything else. Things such as inconclusive or unconvincing data, wrongful assumptions, missing data that would complement and further prove the conclusion, or even trivial things such as a sentence being unclear.

It generally works as long as you can trust that the author isn't dishonest

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

A LOT of things work without safety nets if people engage honestly.

The problem, with FAR more than science, is many, many people are distinctly NOT honest.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

I do trust scientists about peer review more than code reviews. This is how I imagine the crowd strike reviewer.