this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
1414 points (98.0% liked)

Science Memes

11205 readers
3895 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
1414
Crystals (mander.xyz)
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
168 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Fermilab never found the god particle and we're pretty sure that exists.

The "God particle" is the Higgs boson. They found it with the LHC.

Think about all of the theories and hypothesis that have been altered or completely changed over time.

This tells me you don't just not know how science works; you don't understand what science is.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The “God particle” is the Higgs boson. They found it with the LHC.

Right, the fermi lab peeps were skeptical about ever finding it. LHC proved it. You're making my case.

This tells me you don’t just not know how science works; you don’t understand what science is.

Do you? It's a process of finding out. Have you proven that stones don't have an energy that we don't have the equipment to measure? The black and white in this thread is now becoming funny while spouting that you believe in the process.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you know it's a process, then why would you criticize science for changing theories in response to new evidence?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you know it’s a process, then why would you criticize science for changing theories in response to new evidence?

Why aren't you open to not knowing everything and that our knowledge could change?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Your making some really weird—and wrong—assumptions about me.