Technology

59107 readers

3248 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

291

Thousands of authors demand payment from AI companies for use of copyrighted works (www.cnn.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

294 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Thousands of authors demand payment from AI companies for use of copyrighted works::Thousands of published authors are requesting payment from tech companies for the use of their copyrighted works in training artificial intelligence tools, marking the latest intellectual property critique to target AI development.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No but a lazy copy of someone else’s work might be copyright infringement.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So when does Kevin Costner get to sue James Cameron for his lazy copy of Dances With Wolves?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Idk, maybe. There are thousands of copyright infringement lawsuits, sometimes they win.

I don’t necessarily agree with how copyright law works, but that’s a different question. Doesn’t change the fact that sometimes you can successfully sue for copyright infringement if someone copies your stuff to make something new.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Avatar is not Dances with Wolves. It's Ferngully.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Why not? Hollywood is full to the brim with people suing for copyright infringement. And sometimes they win. Why should it be different for AI companies?