this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
113 points (82.7% liked)

No Stupid Questions

36192 readers
894 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Author Joel Williamson shared Elvis kept a group of three 14-year-old girls with him on the tour who were up "for pillow fights, tickling, kissing and cuddling when he was 22.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Fun fact: there's no such thing as objective morality. Back in the 1920s people thought it was objectively terrible for Black people to have equal rights.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I said it was objectively terrible, I didn't mention morals. :)

Harming people is terrible, whether or not social morality supports it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It wasn't seen as harmful back then.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No, but it was harmful.

I'm talking about the objective harm of encouraging underage girls to avoid study and live their lives in the service of older men. There is nothing good that can be said about such a thing. It's basically indentured servitude.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ok, it wasn't seen as relatively more harmful than anything else that would cause strain in a young person's social, educational, and professional growth. Like an overinterest in sports or gambling or books.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I'm not talking about how it was seen. I'm talking about how it is. There's a difference.

Cutting off hands was seen as socially acceptable at certain times in history, if someone was merely accused of theft. But it is horrific and terrible. How it was seen as irrelevant to it being terrible objectively terrible.

Are you just trolling, or are you actually trying to defend some of that behavior?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I’m not talking about how it was seen. I’m talking about how it is.

Ok, have fun with that, because that's not what I was talking about at all.

are you actually trying to defend some of that behavior?

Fuck you for trying to win internet points by trying to paint someone as agreeing with pedophilia. It's fucking disgusting and you should be ashamed of yourself.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

...I'm not sure how else you're trying to be seen, based on how you keep responding to me.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago

Then you need drugs or therapy or maybe to get off the internet for a while, because you're so damn eager to find someone to throw your righteous anger at you decided to paint people as pedophiles. It's fucking sick. Stop. Get help.