this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
88 points (97.8% liked)

Videos

14075 readers
195 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article.
  4. Don't be a jerk
  5. No advertising
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s hard to justify going after media orgs. Especially the government justifying going after the media. The freedom of speech points to stopping government action in this exact case. This gives the perfect vector for corporate take overs. And now my media diet consists of comedians.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

there is precedence for the government ensuring balanced discourse on public airwaves with the fairness doctrine. there is only a finite amount of spectrum to be licensed out so the government needs to be able to ensure the broadcasters who do get licenses are providing more than a single biased point of view.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Sorta? It’s complicated, and it’s important to note that it’s been repealed in 1987. And even in its hay day, its was controversial due to the government deciding what was fair, rendering free speech obsolete.

No when the government wants to silence media, they usually turn to clerical infractions, and fines for other reasons. And other harassment behavior. Sure they may do it to stations i want gone, but it’s still scummy.