this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2024
203 points (94.3% liked)

Technology

59672 readers
2852 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/40364175

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Samsung Galaxy Ring, or How To Sell eWaste For 500 Bucks Apiece.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I stand corrected!

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

You realize that simply because of its size, there's less e-waste here than like an electric toothbrush, right?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

I think size is the wrong point of comparison, considering this is literally pointless tech. I'm not opposed to wearables, but we're just not at the point where we have small and relevant enough tech to make a ring more advantageous than a fitness band.

Plus we really need to prioritise repairability in all cases, regardless of the tech's application. I'd say we shouldn't even produce something we couldn't then subsequently fix if the need should arise.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Man, if you're going to start gatekeeping about pointless tech than a fitness band is also pointless.

Go out and run til you're tired and eat right and you'll get fit.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 months ago

I honestly don't see the fitness tech in itself as useless, it holds clear benefits for us. I'm just not one to encourage creating increasingly wasteful and predatory iterations of said tech.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I've ordered the ring because I have the watch, but I don't like wearing the watch at home. Sometimes I put it on at home, but instinctively I find myself taking it off within a few hours. I especially don't like wearing the watch while I sleep. However I have no problem wearing a ring all day. The form factor itself is more advantageous for me, because it's the difference between wearing it or not. When I leave the house, I have no problem putting my watch on and keeping it on. Same way I don't have a problem putting on shoes and keeping them on. But like the watch, I don't like wearing shoes at home.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

In this point we disagree, and this being the internet, I feel the need to specify that I'm not being combative, nor mean any disrespect toward your preferences or beliefs.

In my opinion, we're at the point where we have other, bigger things to prioritise over creature comforts.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

If you have to argue about how little ewaste it creates when it gets thrown away then the thing shouldn't have been made in the first place