this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
874 points (98.3% liked)

RPGMemes

10366 readers
162 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Now I have the idea of a level 7 elf wizard but he's also like level 20 fighter and he just wanted to re-spec

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It would be funny if, after a certain point in their life, elves learning one thing made them forget another thing.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago

It's like Pokemon. You only get four skill slots.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

I think I might be that kind of elf.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sorta turns the AD&D mechanic on its head. And it makes more sense than the way it was done in AD&D - I like it!

Context: in AD&D, humans could “dual class,” which is similar to what you described - effectively retiring in one class and beginning to advance in another - and non-humans could “multi-class,” where they gained experience in two or more classes at the same time, leveling more slowly but getting the benefits of both classes.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Further context, assuming the ruleset governing the OG Baldurs Gate games was true to the tabletop (I know they sort of kludged AD&D and aspects of 3e together). As the above said, a dual classed human "retires" their original class, and then begins to advance in their new class, essentially starting over from level 1, with only the hit dice and HP of their original class rolled over (you cannot access any of the class abilities you learned while advancing your original class). However, once your new class level is superior to your original class level, you can now access both skill sets.

It's a very strange system, and I am curious what the fluff reasons surrounding it are, if anyone has any insight into that edition.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I remember it being especially bizarre because it basically means going through a large portion of the game with a more or less useless character soaking up xp, after which you either have a slightly less useless underlevelled character or one that's brokenly OP depending on how you planned out the combo. And if you dual class too late you just never get to that point and it's all drawback no benefit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Elminster did it right. 1 level of fighter, 3 of cleric, 1 of rogue, and 15 Wizard, followed by 30 levels of Epic Wizard.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

In AD&D, you still had access to the abilities of your retired classes, but if you used them you had experience penalties (if you use them in an encounter, you gain no experience for that encounter and your experience for the entire adventure is halved) . The reason was that you were supposed to be learning to do things a new way, and if you fell back to the old way, you weren’t pushing yourself anymore. From the AD&D PHB, under “Dual-Class Benefits and Restrictions”:

This is not to imply that a dual-class human forgets every-thing he knew before; he still has, at his fingertips, all the know-ledge, abilities, and proficiencies of his old class. But if he uses any of his previous class’s abilities during an encounter, he earns no experience for that encounter and only half experi-ence for the adventure.

The paragraph goes on to explain what’s restricted (everything but HD and hit points), then ends with:

(The character is trying to learn new ways to do things; by slipping back to his old meth-ods, he has set back his learning in his new character class.)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

1/10th life Crisis