this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
311 points (89.6% liked)

World News

32073 readers
1170 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In her first interview as the Democratic presidential nominee, Vice President Kamala Harris told CNN it was imperative to reach a ceasefire deal in Gaza, but made it clear that she would not alter President Joe Biden’s policy in the region.

However, when pressed on whether she would stop sending weapons to Israel she told Bash, “No, we have to get a deal done, Dana. We have to get a deal done.”

“Adopting an arms embargo against Israel’s assault on Gaza is not only a moral imperative but also a strategic move to defeat Trump and MAGA extremism. It is difficult for the Democratic candidate to champion democracy while arming Netanyahu’s authoritarian regime” reads a recent letter to Harris from the coalition Not Another Bomb.

Recent polling has repeatedly demonstrated that Democratic voters overwhelmingly support the conditioning of U.S. military aid. A Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) survey from March found that 52% of Americans want the U.S. to halt weapons shipments to Israel in order to force a ceasefire. 62% of Biden voters said “The US should stop weapons shipments to Israel until Israel discontinues its attacks on the people of Gaza,” while only 14% disagreed with the statement.

The numbers from a June CBS News poll were even higher, with more than 60% of all voters and almost 80% of Democrats saying the U.S. shouldn’t send Israel weapons.

“The real question should have been, ‘When are you going to start enforcing U.S. law as it relates to arms shipments’ because what we are doing right now, with this United States policy, is in violation of not just international law, but also of American law, “said the Arab Center’s Yousef Munayyer in an interview with Democracy Now in response to the CNN segment. “Vice-President Harris made it clear in other parts of her interview that she wants to be a prosecutor. She wants to enforce the law, but Israel is clearly getting an exception from the Harris campaign.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

I have little hope that Biden, Harris, or (obviously) Trump will actually change course on the US’s Israel/Palestine policy—but to be fair, we shouldn’t expect the current vice president to openly say she would reverse the current president’s foreign policies even if she intended to.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why not? She's not the Secretary of State and she's not setting foreign policy like Dick Cheney.

Why must she adhere to Biden's policies?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

That $5 million in AIPAC cash says she must adhere to Biden's/Israel's policies.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago

No I would actually expect a candidate to talk about what they intend, and whatever excuse there's not to sounds silly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

There's no way a US president is going to stop supporting Israel. She would do the same thing, even if she were not the vice-president.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 weeks ago

Exactly. If she wanted to do anything about it she wouldn't be able to even mention it. If she said anything that isn't pro Israel, she'd just piss off Israel and a large amount of her own party. Politicians have always been cowards when it comes to Israel and always will be.