this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
489 points (86.5% liked)

196

16381 readers
2187 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 128 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Wait, what? That's not wage theft at all. It's fucked up and something we need to fix, but wage theft is a different thing entirely

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago

I feel like this is among the loosest definitions of it. Like, it fits the spirit of it and should be considered as a type of wage theft but it’s bottom of the list after things like not paying people what they’re literally contractually obligated to recieve.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

"at all" seems a bit far fetched

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I am amazed at how many people think that "being paid what you are contractually owed" and "being paid what you deserve" are entirely different. I feel like in many instances even if there is breach of contractual obligations (such as not paying at all or enough for overtime etc), the amount of money employers steal by not paying people what they deserve (based on profits and what not) is orders of magnitude higher than what they fail to pay contractually.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I am amazed at how many people think that "being paid what you are contractually owed" and "being paid what you deserve" are entirely different

...what? Yes, the writing on the contract is different from whatever set of ethics you happen to ascribe to. You can make philosophical arguments that they should be the same, but expressing disbelief at two clearly different things being different is... well, it's insane.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

If you want to discuss definition in the formal sense, it suffices to say "that is not the definition of wage theft here it is bla bla". Instead when you say "Wait, what? they are entirely different you insane lunatic" most reasonable people will think that you are completely against even using the two concepts in the same sentence. As an example someone says "Donald Trump is a champion of democracy" and I say "Wait, what? Are you insane? Donald trump and democracy are entirely unrelated".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

"Wait, what? they are entirely different you insane lunatic"

You used quotes but somehow avoided quoting anyone 🤔 odd