this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
362 points (98.9% liked)
Programmer Humor
32733 readers
614 users here now
Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)
Rules:
- Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
- No NSFW content.
- Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's only invalid if it generated errors.
But yeah, I typically play it safe and follow the standards. I do wish JSON5 would catch on though.
I understand this line of thinking, but unless they specify what "flavor" of JSON they accept, I think it's safe to assume they only accept what's in spec. What I find weird is that they immediately contradict the spec with their example by writing JavaScript. Should the
content-typethen beapplication/javascript? They can easily document the parameters outside the request body instead of adding comments.Also, yes, I know I'm being pedantic, but if I'm applying for a job, it's a two way application. They need to give me reason to trust that they're worth working for. Making up rules along the way when referencing a commonly known spec doesn't give me much confidence.
That looks like a JavaScript object. It's not incorrect sytax for a JavaScript object.