this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
209 points (95.6% liked)
Technology
57435 readers
4383 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Unintuitive for you, perhaps. I found it more intuitive than the press and hold (until it became ubiquitous), since it made more sense for a preview. Press and hold, in my mind, is more for secondary menus and alternative options, like mass-selecting.
The air gestures were also nice if I had my hands full, since they worked without turning the screen on, and without touching it, although they leaned more heavily on the gimmick side of things.
Yes. I use it a lot when I have my phone on a stand, or when I have gloves on. Fingerprint readers don't work through gloves, for obvious reasons, and it's less effort than having to fumble around with my phone and my gloves, especially when I will be putting the glove back on afterwards.
Since my phone also has the fingerprint reader on the back, rather than the front, it also makes it much easier to unlock my phone without picking it up, which is nice when it's on its wireless charging pad, or I want to quickly check a notification or something, rather than needing to pick it up.
As for speed, I've not found it that much worse than the fingerprint, especially once the camera's fired up. The hard part tends to be aligning yourself just right, and that you need to tap a "confirm" button compared to the one-click that fingerprint does.
The space won't be used for battery. It's a small chip on the PCB, and Samsung would either keep it around for other sensors, or would leave that space blank. Having a tiny battery protrusion like that is silly anyway. Having a little dingle like that would just make the battery more likely to be damaged and erupt into a violent conflagration.
I personally found it handy, even if it was underutilised. Sometimes you want information from within the house, not outside of it, and if your phone can fetch that information and present it, you don't need to go and buy a separate hygrometer and air pressure sensor, and carry it around, or have to feed that information via an external service.
Assuming that your TV comes with support for those. If it doesn't, such as if it's an older television, then you would be out of luck.
Personally, I used mine a bunch back in the day, just because it was nice to be able to fire up the VCR, Amplifier, and TV all in one button, rather than a bundle of loose remotes, but that's more of a first world problem, and less of an issue these days, since television is on the decline.
More importantly, though, the phones aren't cheaper despite the loss of these features. The phones just get more expensive, even though they had fewer sensors and features like that.
Counterpoint: phones like Redmi 9T have it all. Headphone jack, expandable storage, IR blaster, NFC... Also manages to have a "okay" battery capacity that's 6Ah.
The only problem is it costs too little so people don't consider it.
First, even for Xiaomi that phone is crap with a myriad of software related complaints alone. On the hardware front its cheap because cheap in gets cheap out. Underpowered even for 2021.
Oh I see. I just ...hadn't noticed. Probably because these people are overreacting. But sure, if you need to justify getting a new smartphone, you better spend loads of money to make sure it looks good on benchmarks.
Found the Samsung fuck boy
The point is that technology isn't supposed to get in the way of us doing things and that's exactly what removing features that are useful to people does.
Usually there is a compromise somewhere though. If they could just add all the features without any downsides, they surely would (and demand a premium for it). Granted, sometimes it is just cheaper to get rid of it (and thus make more profit), but sometimes its just a decision to cater to a minority or provide a benefit for the majority of users.