this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
1333 points (96.4% liked)

Political Memes

5413 readers
2876 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1333
Dear America (sopuli.xyz)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Edited to replace original incorrect Herzog attribution with my own version that correctly attributes the quote

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 months ago (4 children)

This has been reported for violating rule 2: "No misinformation", as the quote was misattributed.

The full rule:

Don’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

OP admitted they didn't double check the author of the quote. This means it was not intentional.

Leaving it up.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'll just make a new one (this isn't oc) when I get home but that'll be 10h at least. It's OK to nuke this since it is sorta misinfo, although I didn't know it when I posted it

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nah. That would nuke all the back-and-forth found here. I'd rather keep the discussion up.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

I have a deep appreciate for this level of discernment. Moderating posts and their discussions in good-faith and abiding by the spirit/intention of the rules instead of strict enforcement by letter fosters community trust and makes it more difficult to argue against removals/bans when they do happen.

Thanks for volunteering and keeping the lights on.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

See he should have attributed that quote to Julius Caesar, then it would be considered humor and not misinformation.

JFC just enjoy the meme.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Should I make a new rule that all quotes must be attributed to Oscar the Grouch? I will, either way.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

"All quotes must be attributed to Oscar the Grouch."

  • Oscar the Grouch
[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

This sounds like if someone just said they didn't know it was bs, it's a get out of jail free card.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

not a good reason to leave it up. Think about the precedent that sets.

[–] luciferofastora 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

...the precedent that people are allowed to make minor mistakes? Gasp THE HORROR

Seriously, this mistake isn't a big deal, no intentional misdirection and in any case, the quote is more important for conversation than the actual author.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I think the objection here is that it creates a massive loophole: Intentionally post misinformation, claim you thought it was legitimate. Repeat until you stop getting the benefit of the doubt, start over with a new account, repeat ad infinitum.

I'm not sure what the best solution is, but I think we at least need some kind of very clear notice, on the feed page and not just in the comments, that the content is proven to be factually incorrect.

[–] luciferofastora 3 points 2 months ago

If it's more serious misinformation, it probably warrants taking down the post, even if unintentional. The nuance would then be that genuine error doesn't immediatly warrant banning, even if the post is taken down.

This one is a mild and unintentional case with little implications either way. If someone were to cite this as "But this one you left up!" as excuse for a different, more severe case, the mods would justifiably say that it doesn't apply.

Besides, it's not like setting a precedent is as serious for community mods as it is for courts of law - mods can change the rules when a situation arises that warrants it and enforce them accordingly, make one-off decisions for special cases or admit a previous decision was a mistake and generally have more leeway.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think the point is it's factually incorrect about the least significant fact.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

This is a great point but man that was hard to process.

Maybe I'm running a little slow today?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

wait. You saw this comment, and reported it anyways?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Think about the precedent that pulling down discussions wholesale because some inconsequential detail about them is wrong sets.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

It wasn't intentional, FFS. I hate this place so much.