this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2024
9 points (56.5% liked)

Science

13166 readers
87 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: The paper is total nonsense. Sorry for wasting people's time.

https://youtu.be/Yk_NjIPaZk4?si=dasxM2Py-s654djW

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I had my suspicions but I wanted to see what others made of it. The headline was obviously dodgy, but that might just have been the reporting rather than the paper. And I glanced at the paper but didn't dig through. Since then I had a slightly more careful poke through it, and sentences like this ring some pretty loud alarms:

The masses of electrons, muons, and tau can be explained by the different curvatures of universe, galaxy, and solar system, respectively.

Anyway, I appreciate your comments and the comments of the person you replied to. I should have recognized this for what it was.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The masses of electrons, muons, and tau can be explained by the different curvatures of universe, galaxy, and solar system, respectively.

What the actual fuck? I mean I get that it's a bullshit paper but at least try for god's sake.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

like what, the LLM should try harder!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nah, you're doing the right thing: getting input when not sure. That's the way of learning!

Only one request: add the thoughts from this answer to the OP the next time please! Would make reading it a bit easier and better framed, at least for me.

(I.e. "I'm an authority in this field, look at this exciting news!" VS "my bullshit sensors tingle but I don't know enough. What are your thoughts?"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

That's a good suggestion, thanks.